<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox Diva Bike Shorts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geargals.com/2010/04/29/fox-diva-bike-shorts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geargals.com/2010/04/29/fox-diva-bike-shorts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Head Geargal</title>
		<link>http://geargals.com/2010/04/29/fox-diva-bike-shorts/comment-page-1/#comment-480</link>
		<dc:creator>Head Geargal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 05:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geargals.net/?p=682#comment-480</guid>
		<description>Ha! I knew it couldn&#039;t be just me. 

I have a pair of Sugoi baggy shorts that are less offensive to the eye and the hips. I&#039;ll get a review up soon. They&#039;re not perfect but they&#039;re a lot better than the Fox shorts and they are not called the &quot;diva&quot; and they&#039;re not made for &quot;girls&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! I knew it couldn&#8217;t be just me. </p>
<p>I have a pair of Sugoi baggy shorts that are less offensive to the eye and the hips. I&#8217;ll get a review up soon. They&#8217;re not perfect but they&#8217;re a lot better than the Fox shorts and they are not called the &#8220;diva&#8221; and they&#8217;re not made for &#8220;girls&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hanflynn</title>
		<link>http://geargals.com/2010/04/29/fox-diva-bike-shorts/comment-page-1/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>hanflynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geargals.net/?p=682#comment-479</guid>
		<description>This is the most awesome article i have read in forever. 
I have an older pair of the diva like shorts in a M which are awfully snug for baggy shorts.   They are definitely no less revealing than the old spandex.  I am 5&#039;6&#039;&#039; 140 lbs, pretty average in the curve department.  
So i ordered a pair of the Fox base shorts and the diva in the large and they were both absolutely huge!  Falling off, ill fitting and horrid.  So crappy that they cant make a pair of shorts that actually fits.
Glad to hear I&#039;m not the only one running into this.
And yeah, I dont like being lumped in with &quot;girls&quot;.  I&#039;m not built like a 12 year old any more and if that&#039;s the target market, I guess i need to move on.
any suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the most awesome article i have read in forever.<br />
I have an older pair of the diva like shorts in a M which are awfully snug for baggy shorts.   They are definitely no less revealing than the old spandex.  I am 5&#8217;6&#8221; 140 lbs, pretty average in the curve department.<br />
So i ordered a pair of the Fox base shorts and the diva in the large and they were both absolutely huge!  Falling off, ill fitting and horrid.  So crappy that they cant make a pair of shorts that actually fits.<br />
Glad to hear I&#8217;m not the only one running into this.<br />
And yeah, I dont like being lumped in with &#8220;girls&#8221;.  I&#8217;m not built like a 12 year old any more and if that&#8217;s the target market, I guess i need to move on.<br />
any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 229/235 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via N/A

Served from: geargals.com @ 2012-02-09 08:02:59 -->
