Geargals
  • Home
  • Geargals Blog
    • Jill – Head Geargal’s Blog
    • Janna G’s Blog
    • Mary’s Blog
    • Morgan’s Blog
    • Danni’s Blog
  • Reviews
    • Outdoor Gear Reviews
    • Travel Gear Reviews
    • Moto
  • About Geargals
Search the site...
Home» Geargals Blog » Things That Represent Women, According to Our Gear

Things That Represent Women, According to Our Gear

Posted by Morgan - November 7, 2012 - Geargals Blog, Morgan's Blog
11

Often, when I walk through a gear store or participate in outdoor activities with men, I notice one distinct difference in our clothing and gear. Well, ok, two- color is an obvious one. Companies have started making a lot more clothing and gear in more colors for both genders, instead of the standard black and grey. But a big difference I’ve noticed is the use of graphics on women’s clothes, and the lack thereof on men’s. And while I’m not totally opposed to the “accenting” of my stuff on the whole, I’ve noticed a certain trend in the choice of graphics applied to women’s things: for the most part, they’re all dainty and fragile things. Let’s take a closer look at the common offenders, shall we?

1. Flowers- So many flowers EVERYWHERE! On everything. It’s actually quite amazing how many different ways companies have managed to put flowers on their stuff. Screen print, woven, stitched, engraved, realistic, whimsical… one company even attaches a hair band with a fake flower to their packs. What is that? I’ve never though, “Oh, if I’d just worn my flower hair band today that hike would have gone so much better.” No! And again, the choice of flower is usually dainty and fragile. Things like daisies, lilies, and baby’s breath (really?). I’m not totally opposed to the concept of the flower. They are pretty and they smell nice. But why not at least use a flower that’s tough and fights back, like a rose? And why flowers in the first place? Remember how they used to cover just about every couch in an awful floral pattern that people eventually realized was horribly ugly? Just because the coloring and style of flowering has changed doesn’t make it a whole lot different. Perhaps companies think that flowers are visually appealing to women while the clothes are hanging on the rack and that it’ll help sell their things, but when I shop for gear, the appearance is only a small factor in my decision to buy. And shouldn’t an item’s effectiveness at what it was made for be the selling point? I want a piece of gear that is tough, functional, and long lasting. I don’t want to look like a walking bouquet when I’m in the mountains. There’s plenty of real flora to admire out there.

2. Dragonflies- Again, why? What is it about this strange looking insect that says “woman”? Dragonflies weird me out. When I lived by a lake growing up, they’d fly around while we were trying to play and annoy the crap out of us. They zoom right in front of your face and then stop and just hover there, as if that is the absolute best place in the whole yard for them to hang out at that moment. Have you ever had two mating dragonflies land on you? I have. They just conduct their business all out in the open, without any care to what, or who, they land on. They used to swarm the golf courses when my dad took me out to learn how to play and I hated when they touched me. One night, I had a dream that they landed on my legs and started sucking out the blood with their creepy little pointy tails. In my dream it didn’t hurt, but my dad told me that everything would be ok as I sat on his lap and watched my legs turn purple. I think I was 6 when I had that dream and I still remember it. So, sorry, but I have no idea what these annoying, sex-crazed, blood-sucking creatures have to do with me. If that’s what you’re looking for, I’d refer you to the Twilight series.

3. Birds- Now here’s one I can get on board with. To me, birds have always symbolized a sort of free-spiritedness. They’re smart and resourceful and can be pretty clever, too. I’ve always thought it would be cool to take off in flight under my own power and just kinda cruise around, enjoying the views. I’ve seen tastefully done bird graphics, such as simple silhouettes or as a small accent or embroider. Arc’teryx’s bird logo is one of my favorites. It’s unique and is usually the only detail on otherwise clean and well-fitting (and extremely functional) clothing. Birds don’t usually scream fru-fru to me like a flower does. The closest I’ve seen to crossing the line is the use of peacocks. I’ve seen one shirt with so much peacock on it, I nearly went cross-eyed. I also recently saw a pair of skis with a HUGE peacock graphic on it, but the colors were subdued and it wasn’t quite so in your face (also, though I haven’t spent much time skiing at resorts, I get a faint vibe that skiers and snowboarders really like insane pictures and graphics scribbled all over their gear. Or maybe that’s just what all the companies do so they’ve forced themselves to like it?).

4. Fur- Fur has certain practical uses. It’s a good non-technical glove lining because it’s so warm and soft. It’s even useful along hoods to help catch snow and keep it out of your face. But I’ve seen fur in bizarre places. I saw a set of women’s hiking poles that had fur lining the wrist strap. I don’t know about you, but I’m usually wearing gloves when I’m using ski poles, so I’m not really sure what practical use the fur has in that location. I’ve also seen fur on a pair of resort ski boots. Several things wrong with this; one, most people I know wear socks with their ski boots, negating the soft, fuzzy feeling you’d get, say, in a pair of gloves. Two, you know how animals dry their fur? By licking it. Otherwise it really doesn’t dry that fast. So either, you get to lick your sweaty ski boots dry, or you get to wait for them to dry, missing out on that sweet pow, brah. I’ve never seen fur on a dude’s gear, besides the aforementioned practical uses. And even those uses don’t really encompass actual technical gear (exception to this are those fuzzy jackets that are trending right now, made for men and women. Now that I think of it though, does anyone actually use those as active wear?). And so I bring you back full circle: why does fur represent women? It’s not there for practical purposes, so why is it there at all?

5. Sparkles and Swirlies- WTF? Unless you’re trying to imply that I’m some sort of magical snow goddess, is this really necessary (I saw a show about a real-life goddess last night and it doesn’t sound that great. She’s not allowed to speak or show emotion in public, gets carried everywhere, and her own dad kisses her feet. No thanks.)? You know when is the last time I used sparkles? When I made a huge, gaudy, sparkly welcome home poster meant to embarrass my husband. I ended up wearing sparkles for a few days after, but that was incidental damage, and not intentional. Before then, the only other time I remember wearing sparkles is in middle school I had this awful sparkly rainbow-striped sweater that I can’t believe my parents didn’t stop me from wearing out of the house.  I don’t know if this is yet another attempt to attract the female eye and encourage purchasing, but my first thought when I see sparkles is “really?” What is it about sparkles and swirls that seemed “woman” enough to put on our gear. They add no practical value to our things, so I don’t understand why the man-power and resources were expended to add them.

So what do we want? Well, personally, I think the simpler, the better. Most of the gear I have, I’ve used extensively and know exactly what works in which conditions. It’s sometimes hard for me to phase in new stuff since I’ve found a system that works for me and for the most part, covers the spectrum of needs. When I think about the items that comprise this system, the trend in appearance is simple, with splashes of color. I do prefer to not be clothed head to toe in black. Admittedly, I do love pink, but last year I got dressed for a ski day and realized that I was clothed head to toe in various shades of pink which, unfortunately, clashed a bit more than all black. I felt a little silly, so I’ve tried to diversify my color selections. But I think all outdoor enthusiasts, regardless of gender, can agree that functionality is a top priority, especially when you’re paying top dollar for your gear. If a piece of gear fits that criteria, then it shouldn’t need sparkles and graphics to sell it. Clean lines, simple colors, and most importantly, gets the job done. I think those are things we can all agree on.

 

Related Posts

  • Send Us T-ShirtsSend Us T-Shirts
  • What I Was Talking About – Bike Clothing I LikeWhat I Was Talking About – Bike Clothing I Like
  • Oh, BethanyOh, Bethany
  • Heli-skiing: You can do it naked if you have to, as long as you have the ten essentials listed below.Heli Skiing Gear Essentials
  • How To Pick Up Women At Fire CampHow To Pick Up Women At Fire Camp
Zemanta
gear, industry, women

11 comments on “Things That Represent Women, According to Our Gear”

  1. Mary says:
    November 9, 2012 at 6:30 pm

    OMG, I never really noticed all the flowers before.

    Reply
    • Jill - Head Geargal says:
      November 10, 2012 at 6:26 am

      How could you NOT???

      Reply
      • Mary says:
        November 12, 2012 at 9:34 pm

        I guess because I haven’t bought anything in awhile. I just kind of skim through catalogs in search of a particular item that I need, not really focusing on the rest.

        Reply
        • Morgan says:
          November 12, 2012 at 10:03 pm

          If you ever have some free time, go walk around REI and just look at the designs on clothes. That’s what I did while I was writing this and when I was actually paying attention to what was on the clothes, I was amazed by the amount of flowers on stuff. It’s bizarre.

          Reply
  2. Danni says:
    November 12, 2012 at 1:27 am

    I want practical but flattering, which tends to be design and shape but not embellishment. I like pretty colors like greens, blues and purples. Mostly I want all clothes to be flattering. Yeah I care.

    Reply
    • Morgan says:
      November 12, 2012 at 10:00 pm

      Shape is definitely important. I really like colors too but I tend not to keep things around too long if they don’t fit well, obviously. I don’t know if a lot of my stuff is flattering, though. Like, high rise pants. Not flattering. Most of my pants are baggy in the butt too. I guess I’ve never thought of that much before but I agree that it’d be nice to have.

      Reply
  3. Lynn says:
    November 12, 2012 at 8:51 pm

    I bought a pair of mountain biking gloves on clearance that have rhinestones on them! Not only do they look ridiculous, the rhinestones get in the way when I’m trying to wipe my nose on the back. That’s the main purpose of bike gloves, right?

    Reply
    • Morgan says:
      November 12, 2012 at 9:55 pm

      Rhinestones?!? That’s crazy. I really want to know who thought that would be a good thing to put on a piece of technical gear. Probably someone who doesn’t use their own products. It’s probably the reason they were on clearance in the first place. I will say though, I’d probably have bought them too if they were cheap.

      Reply
      • Lynn says:
        November 13, 2012 at 11:26 pm

        I ordered them online, and I was so excited that they were bright blue instead of pink. Then, when they arrived, I noticed the rhinestones. I’m sure you’re right and that is why they were on clearance. At least I didn’t spend too much on them.

        Reply
  4. Jill - Head Geargal says:
    November 14, 2012 at 7:03 pm

    The more I see gear and gear ad campaigns, the more I think that gear companies in general just want women to act and dress like dipshits 100% of the time. Everything must be sparkly and swirly and fluffy! Wipe your nose on your glove? Women don’t do things like that! These clothes are just for standing around and looking pretty.

    Don’t get me started again on that ad campaign for bike shorts with the topless women holding onto each other’s boobs. Actually I’m going to write about that soon.

    Reply
  5. Grace says:
    April 17, 2013 at 5:37 am

    But really, what I REALLY want is dinosaurs. C’mon, gear companies. Female dinosaurs are the sh*t.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Categories

  • About Geargals
  • Danni's Blog
  • Geargals Blog
  • Head Geargal's Blog
  • Janna G's Blog
  • Mary's Blog
  • Morgan's Blog
  • Moto
  • Moto Gear Reviews
  • Outdoor Gear Reviews
  • Reviews
  • Travel Gear Reviews
  • Uncategorized

Blogroll

  • Andre Horton's Photography – DreFoto
  • Erin and Hig's Trekking Page
  • Jill Homer
  • Joe Stock, IMFGA Guide
  • Kim Kircher
  • Life According to Kellie
  • Mike Wiegele Heli Skiing
  • Mrs. North of Sixty
  • MTB4Her
  • Random Thoughts From A Concrete Sequential
  • Smirnie Outdoors
  • Stop and Smell the Lichen
  • The Campsite
  • Tres Chicas Locas
  • Wheel To Live

Recent Gear Reviews

  • ABS Avalanche Airbag System (Backpack)

    April 21, 2013
  • Firstgear HT Overpants

    April 19, 2013
  • Selling A Bike: When It’s Not Right For You

    April 17, 2013
  • The Top Ten Attributes of the Top Ten Adventure Towns

    April 10, 2013
  • Lake 303 Winter Cycling Boots

    April 3, 2013
  • MSR Surelock Poles

    March 25, 2013
  • FERA Seamless Base Layers

    March 23, 2013
  • Heather Bradshaw’s Travel Rules

    March 14, 2013
  • Vittoria Hora Cycling Shoes

    February 28, 2013
  • Loeka Cascade Freeride Shorts

    February 26, 2013
  • Helly Hansen Verglas Randonee Pant

    February 20, 2013
  • Qwik Wrapz

    February 15, 2013

    Most Recent Posts By Jill, Head Geargal

    • Spring Remains Coiled

      April 21, 2013
    • Selling A Bike: When It’s Not Right For You

      April 17, 2013
    • The Top Ten Attributes of the Top Ten Adventure Towns

      April 10, 2013

      By Mary

      • I Get Into a Stupid Facebook Argument About Hiking

        April 25, 2013
      • Why I Love Cottage Industries

        April 17, 2013
      • What’s Being A Woman Have To Do With It?

        March 26, 2013

        By Morgan

        • How to be a Good Roommate/Houseguest

          April 22, 2013
        • Down the Wrong Road

          January 22, 2013
        • The Pros and Cons of Camping with a Dude

          November 30, 2012

          Most Popular Posts

          Invisible Around Men

          Five Reasons To Date Outdoorsy Women

          Guide To Outdoor Dating

          In Appreciation of the Non-Dirtbag

          How To Meet Outdoorsy Women

          The Cycling Industry's Elephant

          Why Traveling Alone Is Rad

          Ghosts of the Climbing Gym

          The Kind of Man I Like

          Loving Your Gear - Too Much

          Why Singlespeed Riders Are Annoying

          Get in Touch

          • jill@geargals.com
          • Contact Us
            • Twitter
            • Facebook
            • Rss
          (c) 2012 Gear Gals - Web Design by Jason Bobich
          • Terms
          • Privacy Policy
          • Sitemap
          • Contact Us